Monday, 3 June 2013

Ineffable: 1. too great or intense to be expressed in words; unutterable 2. too sacred to be uttered 3. indescribable; indefinable

Having finally published my first book, beyond the excitement is the exhausting exercise of self-promotion.  Knowing that a lot of readers rely on reviews when making their purchases of choice, I have been bothering a multitude of reviewers.  Not having much luck, I was excited to be offered the chance at a review exchange.

I went in with a completely open mind, a bit of excitement and a purely positive outlook on the whole thing.  By the end of it however, my experience is something that I would consider completely ineffable.

Reading through the book of my 'review partner', I was a bit disappointed.  There most certainly were some good parts to it but there was also a lot I didn't like.  And the amount of spelling errors and grammatical mistakes was somewhat appalling.  As I read through, I became more and more concerned with the review I would have to give.  The last thing I wanted was to hurt another author.  So... I focused on the positive as much as I could, assigned the book a three star rating, and gave my explanation.  Knowing how sensitive authors are about their work, I mean come on now, it's like another child to us, I was a little worried about the other reviewer giving me a low rating simply to get me back.  Therefore, I waited until she had posted my review first.

I was astounded, disgusted, and disheartened to discover what came next.  This lady sent me an email telling me that it is customary to simply give each other five stars and focus only on the positive.  Well what's the point of that?  What's the point of even reading the book then?  Man was I bothered.  If that's the case, then all those reviews that readers look to are worthless.  And on top of all that, why would any author want to just be handed an undeserved five star rating?  I certainly don't.  It would just feel so empty.  I want to earn those five stars.

Anyways, once this woman realized what I'd done, you know told the truth and all, she said she would 'adjust her review to a more honest one'.  Oddly enough, a few minutes later I found myself with a three star review instead of the original five.  I just had to laugh.  Honestly, I really did laugh out loud.  Okay it was more of an irritated snicker of disbelief over the lack of maturity from what I expected would be a mature lady.

The worst part was, the write up in her review was nothing but praise and simply didn't match the three star rating she gave me.  Which led me to the obvious... she'd simply reciprocated out of hurt.  The ol' tit for tat.  The thing I had been fearful of from the very beginning had come to fruition.  I guess there had been no point in me waiting to post my review then.

I am curious to hear what your thoughts on this matter are though.  The whole thing just left me with such a sick feeling.  It's just so dishonest.  Would you gladly exchange five stars for a sub-par book to receive five stars yourself?

On a side note, at least being let in on this little secret of 'protocol' made things a lot clearer.  Having read the book, I was quite shocked to find that it had received mostly four or five stars.  But now, after being alerted to the falsity of it all, I see it's all empty anyways.  I am open to the idea that this was strictly my opinion and perhaps others truly did see this writing as exceptional, but with such a thing as false reviews, how will I ever know?

6 comments:

  1. Wow, that is so disheartening. I wonder how many people she had read it before publishing and just said "Looks great!" because they didn't want to hurt her feelings. Would have been more helpful to be truthful, so the spelling mistakes and such could be fixed. There's no way I would be able to give 5 stars to a book I thought didn't deserve it.
    I guess it's a lesson learned. I'd be a lot more wary of doing those swaps again.
    I've never been one to pay too much attention if there are only a couple of reviews. I always assume they are from people who know the author personally. I didn't know it was this blatant, though. Makes me sad.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The worst part was, she told me she had it professionally edited! Thank you for your comment. You've helped me feel better about sticking to my guns with the three stars, it was either that or no review because I really couldn't just blatantly lie about it. I have to say though, I don't think there will be any more of these exchanges in my future.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yeah... that's why I don't do reviews. I don't want to be put into a situation where that's what people expect from me. Because I WILL let them down.

    Besides, I want to earn my stars.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't mind doing reviews for others, knowing that readers sometimes depend on them. However, I doubt I'll be taking part in the exchange again. I agree, I want to earn my stars too! :)

      Delete
  4. And as far as doing and receiving reviews I would think honesty would be "the only policy" and I applaud you for sticking by your guns!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I completely agree Jen Forbes, I honestly don't know what the point of a dishonest review is, in the end it doesn't help anyone.

    ReplyDelete